Summary by TwinMind · 40m 33s
Summary by TwinMind · 40m 33s
From DevOps ‘Heart Attacks’ to AI-Powered Diagnostics With Traversal’s AI Agents
From DevOps ‘Heart Attacks’ to AI-Powered Diagnostics With Traversal’s AI Agents
Sequoia Capital
Sequoia Capital
Company Introduction and Vision
- Traversal co-founders Anish and Raj building AI agents for DevOps and SRE transformation
- Companies currently have "war rooms and armies" of DevOps/SRE engineers troubleshooting production failures
- Production downtime costly, sometimes life-or-death situations
- Problem worsening with AI-generated code and "vibe coding"
- Traversal believes agents are scalable solution, seeing exciting results from deployed troubleshooter agents
Healthcare Analogy for DevOps/SRE Hierarchy
- Stage 1: Heart attack (high severity incidents) - solve immediately, nothing else matters
- Stage 2: Chronic conditions (daily streams of alerts, deployment safety checks)
- Stage 3: Life optimization (5-year infrastructure planning, strategic investments)
- Current reality: DevOps/SRE teams having "heart attack twice a week" plus chronic daily issues
- Traversal's goal: AI handles stages 1-2, humans focus on creative strategic work (stage 3)
Impact of AI-Powered Coding Tools
- Short-term: Tale of two worlds
- Fast fashion coding: disposable code, reliability doesn't matter
- Mission-critical systems: payments, financial institutions, security, streaming
- AI tools pass local unit tests but break at scale when systems interact unexpectedly
- Major issue: hard to debug AI-generated code due to lack of context
- Risk: Either ban AI tools due to downtime or need new maintenance tools
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Lifecycle
- Customer reports issue → escalates through 5 engineering organization ladders
- DevOps/SRE team determines incident severity/impact
- Creates Slack incident channel with 30-50 people
- Implicit blame game, "who done it" atmosphere
- 10x engineer emerges as "Sherlock Holmes," figures out root cause
- Rollback/hotfix implemented, longer-term fix planned later
- Observability tools are #2 software spend after cloud, yet RCA remains manual
Observability Limitations
- Current tools: MELT data (metrics, events, logs, traces)
- Focus on data creation, storage, visualization
- Complex troubleshooting workflow remains manual
- Fragmented landscape: DataDog, Splunk, Dynatrace, Elastic, Grafana, ServiceNow
- Pricing models based on data storage, no incentive for cross-platform insights
- AI agents can automate complex workflows beyond storage/visualization
Traversal Product Architecture
- Multi-agent system with LLM orchestration of tools
- Tools: data fetching (logs, metrics), data processing, statistical analysis (anomaly detection)
- Sequential approach needed - single trace may not fit LLM context
- Gradually builds context to reach root cause
- Mirrors human troubleshooting but more systematic, following Google SRE handbook principles
- Less reliant on system knowledge gaps, more comprehensive coverage
Performance and Conditions
- Works better at large enterprises vs Series A startups
- Large enterprises: mature observability, fragmented teams, rich data available
- Success depends on reasoning steps being findable in data
- When root cause in data: L4 autonomous level, >90% accuracy, 2-4 minutes resolution
- When root cause not in data: L2 level, finds important symptoms to aid human debugging
- Gold standard evaluation: live incidents (2-3 per week), postmortem comparison
Technical Implementation
- Offline phase: learns dependency maps using LLMs and statistics
- LLMs understand semantic relationships between logs/tags
- Statistics extract causal relationships from time series variations
- Self-play prioritizes promising RCA paths
- Online phase: uses real-time info + dependency map for incident investigation
- Setup time: 5-10 hours (small customers), up to 1 day (large customers)
- Read-only data access requirement
Technology Stack and Constraints
- Must use customer's existing LLM contracts (OpenAI, Anthropic)
- Custom models create "security hell for about a year"
- Fine-tuning within customer environment using incident feedback
- Architecture designed for reasoning model improvements (September bet paid off)
- Constant 6-month technology bets required
Academic Research Translation
- Raj's PhD: gene regulatory networks, CRISPR interventions at Broad Institute
- Techniques for learning causal structure between genes
- Direct application: genes → microservices, interventions → PR changes/system breaks
- "Sheer luck" that grad school research applied perfectly
Team Composition and Culture
- 90% engineers, mix of ML PhDs and traditional software engineers
- Infrastructure engineers for scaling (thousands of network calls per investigation)
- Product managers joining
- Unified by excitement for generative AI, willingness to adapt/discard
- Experimental mindset more important than credentials
- Quick iteration on AI/data hypotheses
Future of Observability Teams
- Will need fluency in both traditional systems and AI system reliability
- AI systems break in unique ways requiring new approaches
- Logging will fundamentally change - optimized for AI consumption vs human reading
- More information in message fields, less concern about human readability
- Connection between engineering systems and business logic remains challenging
Vibes Coding Future
- Mission-critical systems will use AI tools but with better testing
- Focus shifts from "how code was written" to "does it fulfill function"
- Increased system interaction failures due to third-party SLA misses
- Harder debugging without code context knowledge
- Traversal's role becomes more critical for subtle interaction issues
Rapid Fire Responses
- Next 12 months breakout: reasoning model applications, diagnostics, healthcare
- Admired founder: Doina Precup (reinforcement learning researcher)
- Recommended reading: "The Bitter Lesson" by Rich Sutton
- Admired companies: Glean, Perplexity
- Personal AI tools: ChatGPT exclusively
- 5-year prediction: vibes coding in banking/healthcare "to some extent, yes"
