Is Africa the Next China?

Wendover Productions

Economic Comparison: Africa vs Historical China

Africa's current GDP: $2.69 trillion vs China's 2006 GDP: $2.89 trillion (inflation-adjusted)
Africa's GDP per capita: $1,030 vs China's 2006: $2,100
Africa's urbanization rate equals China's 2008 levels
Africa's foreign direct investment inflows match China's 1992 levels
Key finding: Africa stands roughly 20 years behind today's China economically

Both Africa and China have extensive natural resources
Resource curse phenomenon: abundance of natural resources doesn't translate to sustainable economic growth
- Concentrates wealth to select few
- Workers don't learn transferable skills for innovation/entrepreneurship
- No incentive to improve formal education
China's manufacturing sector provided skills for business creation
- Led to significant homegrown tech sector
- Carried economy beyond manufacturing
Conclusion: Africa's growth must come from human capital, not natural resources

Africa has disproportionately young population (typical of less developed regions)
Europe has middle-aged population (developed region pattern)
China's demographic evolution 1950-2010:
- 1950s-60s: high birth rates, large youth population
- 1970s+: birth rates decline, youth population moves to working age
- Created population bubble with huge working age population, few dependents
- 2010: China's dependency ratio dropped to 36% (almost unprecedentedly low)
- Currently: 42% as population ages into retirement
Demographic dividend: China attributed 9.2% of economic growth (1960-2000) to working age population bulge

Projected 2050 dependency ratio: 60.7%
- Significant improvement from today's 79%
- Far from China's 36% low point
- Higher than current world average of 54.5%
Demographic dividend coming for Africa but less pronounced than China's

Research shows education (especially women's) strongest trigger for demographic dividend
Women have fewer children when better educated
Africa's current female secondary school enrollment: 48.56% of eligible population
China first reached this level in 1977
Cycle: better education → lower dependency ratio → faster development → better education

Africa's fertility rate closest to China's 1974
Life expectancy parallels China's 1976
Infant fatality rate matches China's 1981
Literacy rate comparable to China's 1982
Pattern: Economic indicators suggest Africa in 2000s, demographic indicators suggest 1970s

Primary conclusion 1: Africa primed for development
- In similar/better position than China before explosive growth (1970s-80s)
- Nothing suggests continent isn't ready/capable
- Everything suggests right situation for similar growth
Primary conclusion 2: Gap between economic and demographic indicators raises red flags
- Population state (not economic situation) holding back growth
- Need to focus on family planning, girls' education, women in workforce

Education easiest phase to manipulate in development cycle
- Government directly manages education systems
- More feasible than direct development acceleration or dependency ratio manipulation
Focus areas beyond foreign investment:
- Getting kids in school
- Household electricity access
- Electoral participation
- Quality of life improvements
Quality of life improvements matter beyond just quality of life

Answer: Probably not
China = 1 country, Africa = 54 countries
China got things right once, Africa unlikely to succeed 54 times simultaneously
Aggregate conditions ripe for development, but work still needed
Some countries will trigger development while others won't
Continental fate will become less intertwined over time
Individual African economies will likely be discussed like China today
Disconnected development process means less intense global impact
Conclusion: Conditions exist and timing right - African countries (not continent as whole) might be next China

Try for free